People v. Sanders
This text of 489 N.E.2d 743 (People v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
By allowing the witness to testify at trial as to his observations at the scene of the crime, including his description of the person he saw in the hallway with a gun, the trial court did not violate the pretrial ruling prohibiting the witness from making an in-court identification. As found by the Appellate Division, the witness gave his description to the police prior to the suggestive identification procedures at the station house, and thus the description itself was not tainted by those procedures.
We also agree with the finding that defendant was not prejudiced by the prosecutor’s opening remarks.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur; Judge Titone taking no part.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 N.E.2d 743, 66 N.Y.2d 906, 498 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanders-ny-1985.