People v. Sanders

194 N.W.2d 472, 37 Mich. App. 302
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 30, 1971
DocketDocket No. 12227
StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.W.2d 472 (People v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sanders, 194 N.W.2d 472, 37 Mich. App. 302 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant pleaded guilty to assault with intent to rob being armed and appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.

After an examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

■ Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.W.2d 472, 37 Mich. App. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanders-michctapp-1971.