People v. Sanderlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sanderlin

279 A.D.2d 276, 718 N.Y.S.2d 824, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 100

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 276 (People v. Sanderlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sanderlin, 279 A.D.2d 276, 718 N.Y.S.2d 824, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered April 1, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and attempted petit larceny, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2V2 to 5 years, 1 year and 90 days, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

At trial, defendant expressly conceded in his summation that the element of physical injury under the assault count had been established. In any event, we find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered April 1, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and attempted petit larceny, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2V2 to 5 years, 1 year and 90 days, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

At trial, defendant expressly conceded in his summation that the element of physical injury under the assault count had been established. In any event, we find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 276, 718 N.Y.S.2d 824, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanderlin-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack