People v. Sanchez

2020 NY Slip Op 05294, 187 A.D.3d 413, 129 N.Y.S.3d 764
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sanchez. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 NY Slip Op 8899
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 2020·No. Ind No. 1365/15, 5391/15 Appeal No. 11898 Case No. 2018-3977·Published

Opinion

People v Sanchez (2020 NY Slip Op 05294)
People v Sanchez
2020 NY Slip Op 05294
Decided on October 01, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 01, 2020
Before: Gische, J.P., Oing, Singh, Mendez, JJ.

Ind No. 1365/15, 5391/15 Appeal No. 11898 Case No. 2018-3977

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Erickson Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Brittany N. Francis of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered May 12, 2016, as amended May 13, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenge to the validity of a search warrant is barred by his execution of a valid appeal waiver. The court's colloquy with defendant concerning the waiver avoided conflating the right to appeal with the rights normally forfeited upon a guilty plea, and it exceeded the minimum standards for such a colloquy (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545 [2019], cert denied US , 206 L Ed 2d 512; People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094 [2016]).

Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, the record supports the motion court's finding that defendant failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the searched premises (see generally People v Wesley, 73 NY2d 351, 358-359 [1989]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 1, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanchez, 2020 NY Slip Op 05294, 187 A.D.3d 413, 129 N.Y.S.3d 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 05294 (People v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bryant
68 N.E.3d 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
People v. Wesley
538 N.E.2d 76 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Walker v. United States
140 S. Ct. 2633 (Supreme Court, 2020)