People v. Sanchez

137 A.D.3d 989, 26 N.Y.S.3d 712
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sanchez. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.3d 778
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2016·No. 2014-06652·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated June 10, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level, as he failed to satisfy the threshold condition of identifying an appropriate mitigating factor which is of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and *990 Commentary (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Boykin, 102 AD3d 937 [2013]).

Chambers, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanchez, 137 A.D.3d 989, 26 N.Y.S.3d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

137 A.D.3d 989 (People v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Boykin
102 A.D.3d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)