People v. Sanchez

102 A.D.3d 479, 956 N.Y.S.2d 889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sanchez. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 A.D.3d 911

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cassandra Mullen, J), entered on or about March 2, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Since defendant did not ask the hearing court for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level, that claim is unpreserved (see People v Arps, 65 AD3d 939 [1st Dept 2009]). In any event, we find no basis for such a departure (see generally People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 409 [2010]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant are outweighed by factors presenting a risk of future recidivism. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Renwick, Freedman, Román and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanchez, 102 A.D.3d 479, 956 N.Y.S.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

102 A.D.3d 479 (People v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pettigrew
927 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Arps
65 A.D.3d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)