People v. Sanchez

293 A.D.2d 297, 739 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3566
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sanchez. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 A.D.2d 723

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J., at hearing, Charles Tejada, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered August 2, 1999, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). The record establishes that the [298]*298arresting officer’s testimony as to the detailed and specific description transmitted to him was based on his independent or refreshed recollection (see, People v Rose, 202 AD2d 189, lv denied 83 NY2d 876). Concur—Williams, P.J., Saxe, Buckley, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanchez, 293 A.D.2d 297, 739 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 297 (People v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rose
202 A.D.2d 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)