People v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sanchez

99 A.D.2d 499, 470 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.2d 499 (People v. Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sanchez, 99 A.D.2d 499, 470 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), imposed November 20, 1979, resentencing him pursuant to section 60.09 of the Penal Law, the resentence being a term of imprisonment of four and one-half years to life. Resentence affirmed. The defendant’s judgment of conviction has previously been affirmed by this court (People v Sanchez, 63 AD2d 989). The resentence is neither unduly harsh nor excessive. We agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606.) Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), imposed November 20, 1979, resentencing him pursuant to section 60.09 of the Penal Law, the resentence being a term of imprisonment of four and one-half years to life. Resentence affirmed. The defendant’s judgment of conviction has previously been affirmed by this court (People v Sanchez, 63 AD2d 989). The resentence is neither unduly harsh nor excessive. We agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606.) Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 499, 470 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanchez-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack