People v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sanchez

37 A.D.2d 970, 327 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3049

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 970 (People v. Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sanchez, 37 A.D.2d 970, 327 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3049 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 7, 1969, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Martuseello, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Gulotta, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: The errors committed by the District Attorney upon the opening, together with other cumulative errors, particularly the introduction of evidence of a stolen 1965 GTO automobile which was unrelated to the present charge, deprived defendant of a fair trial. The jury’s request to have the stolen car testimony reread emphasizes its influence upon their minds. Their deliberations took some seven hours.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 7, 1969, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Martuseello, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Gulotta, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: The errors committed by the District Attorney upon the opening, together with other cumulative errors, particularly the introduction of evidence of a stolen 1965 GTO automobile which was unrelated to the present charge, deprived defendant of a fair trial. The jury’s request to have the stolen car testimony reread emphasizes its influence upon their minds. Their deliberations took some seven hours.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 970, 327 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanchez-nyappdiv-1971.