People v. Sanatar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sanatar

6 A.D.2d 843, 176 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Sanatar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sanatar, 6 A.D.2d 843, 176 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from so much of an order of the County

Court, Nassau County, as denied, after a hearing, appellant’s application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered April 27, 1956, and (2) from each and every intermediate order therein made. The 'judgment sought to be vacated convicted appellant, on his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree, sentenced him to serve from 10 to 20 years, and committed him to the Elmira Reception Center. Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed. There was no fraud or misrepresentation by the court, the District Attorney or any officer of the State. Appeal from intermediate orders dismissed (Code Crim. Pro., § 517). Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from so much of an order of the County

Court, Nassau County, as denied, after a hearing, appellant’s application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered April 27, 1956, and (2) from each and every intermediate order therein made. The 'judgment sought to be vacated convicted appellant, on his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree, sentenced him to serve from 10 to 20 years, and committed him to the Elmira Reception Center. Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed. There was no fraud or misrepresentation by the court, the District Attorney or any officer of the State. Appeal from intermediate orders dismissed (Code Crim. Pro., § 517). Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 843, 176 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanatar-nyappdiv-1958.