People v. Samuels
25 N.Y.S. 81, 5 Misc. 585, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 836
Opinion
I think that the application should be granted. This was a surety for the appearance of a prisoner during examination. After default, the prisoner was indicted by the grand jury, and afterwards discharged, together with his bail in the indictment. It would seem unnecessary, therefore, to enforce the recognizance for his original examination. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Samuels, 25 N.Y.S. 81, 5 Misc. 585, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 836 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
25 N.Y.S. 81 (People v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Gabe v. Main
119 P. 844 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)