People v. Samuels

New York Court of Common Pleas

People v. Samuels

8 N.Y.S. 475, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1000, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1628

DecidedFebruary 3, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.Y.S. 475 (People v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Samuels, 8 N.Y.S. 475, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1000, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1628 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The papers submitted do not fulfill the conditions on which the November general term granted leave to renew. No copy of the testimony on which the principal was originally held is submitted, nor is the complainant’s last place of residence; and, although it is sworn to by the surety that the complainant was subpoenaed on the first hearing, that fact could not be within surety’s knowledge, and no source of information is given. The motion must therefore be denied, but with leave to renew on supplying those deficiencies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The papers submitted do not fulfill the conditions on which the November general term granted leave to renew. No copy of the testimony on which the principal was originally held is submitted, nor is the complainant’s last place of residence; and, although it is sworn to by the surety that the complainant was subpoenaed on the first hearing, that fact could not be within surety’s knowledge, and no source of information is given. The motion must therefore be denied, but with leave to renew on supplying those deficiencies.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.Y.S. 475, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1000, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-samuels-nyctcompl-1890.