People v. Samuels

127 A.D.3d 1001, 4 N.Y.S.3d 905
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Samuels. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 A.D.3d 401
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 2015·No. 2012-03724·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), imposed March 23, 2012, upon his conviction of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being five years of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed by the same court on March 8, 2001.

*1002 Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant was still serving his original sentence when the resentence was imposed, the resentence to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-633 [2011]; People v Kearney, 116 AD3d 1064 [2014]; People v Flowers, 116 AD3d 710 [2014]).

Skelos, J.P., Austin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Samuels, 127 A.D.3d 1001, 4 N.Y.S.3d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

127 A.D.3d 1001 (People v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Flowers
116 A.D.3d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Kearney
116 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)