Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Samuels

People v. Samuels

269 A.D.2d 859, 703 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 859 (People v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Samuels, 269 A.D.2d 859, 703 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court impermissibly penalized him for exercising his right to go to trial. “The imposition of a more severe sentence after trial than that offered to defendant pursuant to a plea offer that he rejected, without more, does not support the contention of defendant that he was penalized for exercising his right to go to trial” (People v Jones, 229 AD2d 980, lv denied 89 NY2d 925). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Woods
21 A.D.3d 1314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Lusby
2 A.D.3d 1332 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Taplin
1 A.D.2d 1044 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 859, 703 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-samuels-nyappdiv-2000.