People v. Samuel

235 A.D.2d 506, 652 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 376

This text of 235 A.D.2d 506 (People v. Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Samuel, 235 A.D.2d 506, 652 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinions

Appeal by the [507]*507People from, an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated December 5, 1994, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally insufficient.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

We reverse for reasons stated in People v Washington (228 AD2d 23 [decided herewith]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Washington
228 A.D.2d 23 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D.2d 506, 652 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-samuel-nyappdiv-1997.