People v. Samuel N.

121 A.D.2d 405, 503 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58356
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 2, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 A.D.2d 405 (People v. Samuel N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Samuel N., 121 A.D.2d 405, 503 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered July 11, 1983, convicting him of criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Our review of the record reveals that the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by virtue of certain brief inquiries by the prosecutor and a volunteered statement of a police witness concerning past instances of alleged assaultive behavior by the defendant toward the victim. The defendant was not charged with intentional criminal conduct, but, rather, was accused and convicted of criminally negligent homicide in connection with the discharge of a firearm. Accordingly, we find that, on this record, there was no significant probability that the aforenoted brief references to past instances of alleged intentional conduct materially influenced the jury to the defendant’s prejudice or distracted its attention from the principal issue of the defendant’s culpability for the unintentional discharge of the weapon. In any event, we note that after the trial court struck the police officer’s volunteered statement concerning the alleged assaultive conduct, the defense counsel nevertheless injected the issue into the case again by questioning a defense witness about the nature of the defendant’s relationship with the victim, thereby inviting further inquiry into the subject by the prosecutor on cross-examination.

Finally, the sentence imposed was neither excessive nor harsh under the circumstances of this case. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Carter
197 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.2d 405, 503 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-samuel-n-nyappdiv-1986.