People v. Samuel Feldman Lumber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Samuel Feldman Lumber Co.

243 A.D. 817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 817 (People v. Samuel Feldman Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Samuel Feldman Lumber Co., 243 A.D. 817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant was charged before the Court of Special Sessions, Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, with a violation of the provisions of chapter 781 of the Laws of 1933, commonly known as the Sehaekno Act. Eleven counts charged separate violations of the Code of Fair Competition for the Retail Lumber, Lumber Products, Building Materials and Building Specialties Trade. Defendant was convicted on counts Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8, and was fined $100 each on the first five enumerated, and sentence was suspended on the conviction on No. 8. On appeal the defendant, for the first time, raised the question of the constitutionality of the statute. That question is not available here (People v. Raport, 193 App. Div. 135; People v. Sieke, 222 N. Y. 611; People v. Ostrander, 144 App. Div. 860; Dodge v. Cornelius, 168 N. Y. 242; Nod-Away Co. v. Carroll, 240 id. 252; Matter of Yeannakopoulos, 195 App. Div. 261), and we do not consider it. The statute provides that violation of the provisions of the act constitutes a misdemeanor. The fact that other concurrent remedies are given by the Act or by the Code itself does not oust the courts of jurisdiction [818]*818in a criminal proceeding. Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant was charged before the Court of Special Sessions, Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, with a violation of the provisions of chapter 781 of the Laws of 1933, commonly known as the Sehaekno Act. Eleven counts charged separate violations of the Code of Fair Competition for the Retail Lumber, Lumber Products, Building Materials and Building Specialties Trade. Defendant was convicted on counts Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8, and was fined $100 each on the first five enumerated, and sentence was suspended on the conviction on No. 8. On appeal the defendant, for the first time, raised the question of the constitutionality of the statute. That question is not available here (People v. Raport, 193 App. Div. 135; People v. Sieke, 222 N. Y. 611; People v. Ostrander, 144 App. Div. 860; Dodge v. Cornelius, 168 N. Y. 242; Nod-Away Co. v. Carroll, 240 id. 252; Matter of Yeannakopoulos, 195 App. Div. 261), and we do not consider it. The statute provides that violation of the provisions of the act constitutes a misdemeanor. The fact that other concurrent remedies are given by the Act or by the Code itself does not oust the courts of jurisdiction [818]*818in a criminal proceeding. Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-samuel-feldman-lumber-co-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack