People v. Sams

166 N.E.2d 323, 7 N.Y.2d 978, 199 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1439
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 3, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 166 N.E.2d 323 (People v. Sams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sams, 166 N.E.2d 323, 7 N.Y.2d 978, 199 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1439 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

In People v. Sams: Order affirmed. Even if coram nobis was not available, the order affirming the denial of defendant’s application should be affirmed. (People v. Cassell, 6 N Y 2d 762.) No opinion.

In People ex rel. Sams v. Murphy : Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 N.E.2d 323, 7 N.Y.2d 978, 199 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sams-ny-1960.