People v. Sams
248 N.W.2d 262, 71 Mich. App. 337, 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 956
Opinions
A. M. Bach, J.
Defendant was charged with robbery not armed and found guilty. Defendant raises the objection that the proper foundation was not laid for the admission of a prior inconsistent statement made by defendant. This Court finds that a proper foundation was not laid and defendant was thereby prejudiced and it was not cured by a later admission of the entire document. People v Dozier, 22 Mich App 528, 531-532; 177 NW2d 694 (1970), People v Goree, 30 Mich App 490; 186 NW2d 872 (1971).
Reversed and new trial granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Sams, 248 N.W.2d 262, 71 Mich. App. 337, 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 956 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976).
248 N.W.2d 262 (People v. Sams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Goree
186 N.W.2d 872 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
People v. Plummer
195 N.W.2d 328 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972)
People v. Dozier
177 N.W.2d 694 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)
Lightfoot v. People
16 Mich. 507 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1868)
Hamilton v. People
29 Mich. 195 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1874)