People v. Sampson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sampson

234 A.D.2d 1005, 652 N.Y.S.2d 680

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sampson. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D.2d 314 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1996·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

[1006]*1006—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted (see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38). Memorandum: The assertion of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that he was denied his right to a speedy trial (see, CPL 30.30) was forfeited by his guilty plea (see, People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010). In any event, it lacks merit (see generally, People v Kendzia, 64 NY2d 331, 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1006]*1006—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted (see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38). Memorandum: The assertion of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that he was denied his right to a speedy trial (see, CPL 30.30) was forfeited by his guilty plea (see, People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010). In any event, it lacks merit (see generally, People v Kendzia, 64 NY2d 331, 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Sampson, 234 A.D.2d 1005, 652 N.Y.S.2d 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

234 A.D.2d 1005 (People v. Sampson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related