People v. Sampsell

161 N.E. 454, 248 N.Y. 157, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1240
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 1, 1928·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We hold that the ordinance of the city of Dunkirk (Dunkirk City Ordinances, chap. 5, § 3) is valid, *159 and is not rendered unlawful by Penal Law, section 1985.

We think, however, that the evidence fails to establish that the locomotive was intentionally suffered-to remain standing upon the crossing.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Cabdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Ceane, Andeews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; O’Bbien, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sampsell, 161 N.E. 454, 248 N.Y. 157, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1240 (N.Y. 1928).

161 N.E. 454 (People v. Sampsell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grossman v. Baumgartner
218 N.E.2d 259 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Metropolitan Ass'n of Private Day Schools, Inc. v. Baumgartner
41 Misc. 2d 560 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New York
189 N.E.2d 623 (New York Court of Appeals, 1963)
Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New York
17 A.D.2d 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
People v. Guenther
34 Misc. 2d 559 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Metallic Flowers, Inc. v. City of New York
4 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Heller v. Department of Health
194 Misc. 96 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
People v. Mangini
194 Misc. 615 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1948)
People v. Lewis
64 N.E.2d 702 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)