People v. Sampsell

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Sampsell

161 N.E. 454, 248 N.Y. 157, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1240

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 1, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 161 N.E. 454 (People v. Sampsell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sampsell, 161 N.E. 454, 248 N.Y. 157, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1240 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We hold that the ordinance of the city of Dunkirk (Dunkirk City Ordinances, chap. 5, § 3) is valid, *159 and is not rendered unlawful by Penal Law, section 1985.

We think, however, that the evidence fails to establish that the locomotive was intentionally suffered-to remain standing upon the crossing.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Cabdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Ceane, Andeews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; O’Bbien, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI