People v. Samperi

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Samperi

272 N.E.2d 584, 29 N.Y.2d 550, 324 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1217

DecidedJune 10, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 272 N.E.2d 584 (People v. Samperi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Samperi, 272 N.E.2d 584, 29 N.Y.2d 550, 324 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1217 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following as to each defendant: Upon the appeal herein, there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Defendant argued that his fundamental constitutional rights were violated by the admission into evidence of his confession and by the admission of the confession of his codefendant at their joint trial. The Court of Appeals considered these contentions and held that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 28 N Y 2d 874.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following as to each defendant: Upon the appeal herein, there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Defendant argued that his fundamental constitutional rights were violated by the admission into evidence of his confession and by the admission of the confession of his codefendant at their joint trial. The Court of Appeals considered these contentions and held that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 28 N Y 2d 874.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 N.E.2d 584, 29 N.Y.2d 550, 324 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-samperi-ny-1971.