People v. Sampel

23 A.D.3d 1078, 803 N.Y.S.2d 498
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J), rendered December 6, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of seven years to life imprisonment. On appeal, defendant contends that he has been denied equal protection of the law under the Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Act ([Act] L 2004, ch 738) and that the Act therefore is unconstitutional. We dismiss the appeal because defendant fails to raise any contention with respect to an “error or defect in the criminal court proceedings” resulting in the judgment from which he appealed (CPL 470.15 [1]; see generally CPL 470.60 [1]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sampel, 23 A.D.3d 1078, 803 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

23 A.D.3d 1078 (People v. Sampel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mojica
30 A.D.3d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Garcia
27 A.D.3d 1142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Pena
26 A.D.3d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)