People v. Samon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Samon

128 A.D.2d 741, 513 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44423

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 741 (People v. Samon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Samon, 128 A.D.2d 741, 513 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered April 1, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced at the trial was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the offense of which he was convicted (see, People v Bauer, 113 AD2d 543) and we are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient in quantity and quality to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, we reject the defendant’s contention that the verdict of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell was repugnant to the verdict of not guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (see, People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1; People v Dale, 117 AD2d 612). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered April 1, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced at the trial was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the offense of which he was convicted (see, People v Bauer, 113 AD2d 543) and we are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient in quantity and quality to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, we reject the defendant’s contention that the verdict of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell was repugnant to the verdict of not guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (see, People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1; People v Dale, 117 AD2d 612). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 741, 513 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-samon-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack