People v. Sam

262 A.D.2d 665, 691 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 28, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Sam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sam, 262 A.D.2d 665, 691 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, (Kohm, J.), rendered March 13, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the prosecutor failed to disclose Rosario materials (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Laguer, 195 AD2d 483).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 86-87). Santucci, J. P., Luciano, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hawkins
278 A.D.2d 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 665, 691 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sam-nyappdiv-1999.