People v. Salvatierra

51 A.D.3d 1218, 859 N.Y.S.2d 752
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 A.D.3d 1218 (People v. Salvatierra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Salvatierra, 51 A.D.3d 1218, 859 N.Y.S.2d 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Rose, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), entered February 21, 2006, which, among other things, denied defendant’s motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005.

In satisfaction of two pending indictments, defendant pleaded guilty in April 1997 to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and attempted sodomy in the first degree, and County Court imposed consecutive prison sentences of five years to life and IV2 to 4dk years, respectively. Following the enactment of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643, § 1 [hereinafter DLRA 2005]), defendant applied for resentencing and County Court denied the motion, holding that defendant did not satisfy the eligibility criteria contained therein. This appeal by defendant ensued.

[1219]*1219We affirm. “[I]n order to qualify for resentencing under [DLRA 2005], a class A-II felony drug offender must not be eligible for parole within three years” (People v Thomas, 35 AD3d 895, 896 [2006]). As defendant was already eligible for parole at the time he applied for resentencing, County Court correctly denied his application (see People v Owens, 45 AD3d 1050 [2007]). Inasmuch as defendant was plainly ineligible, as a matter of law, for resentencing, County Court quite properly denied his application and, further, did not err in doing so without a hearing (see People v Perez, 44 AD3d 418, 419 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 992 [2007]).

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harris
2017 NY Slip Op 6219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Bustamante
62 A.D.3d 1209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.3d 1218, 859 N.Y.S.2d 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salvatierra-nyappdiv-2008.