People v. Salvalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Salvalo

286 A.D.2d 636, 730 N.Y.S.2d 427, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 636 (People v. Salvalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Salvalo, 286 A.D.2d 636, 730 N.Y.S.2d 427, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Goldberg, J.), rendered February 25, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Although the waiver of indictment form omitted a written notation of the offense charged and the date and time thereof, it was executed and filed simultaneously with the superior court information containing all the necessary items, and both forms thus constituted a single document that satisfied the requirements of CPL 195.20 (see, People v Long, 273 AD2d 67, lv denied 95 NY2d 854; People v Lamoni, 230 AD2d 628, lv denied 89 NY2d 925). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Goldberg, J.), rendered February 25, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Although the waiver of indictment form omitted a written notation of the offense charged and the date and time thereof, it was executed and filed simultaneously with the superior court information containing all the necessary items, and both forms thus constituted a single document that satisfied the requirements of CPL 195.20 (see, People v Long, 273 AD2d 67, lv denied 95 NY2d 854; People v Lamoni, 230 AD2d 628, lv denied 89 NY2d 925). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 636, 730 N.Y.S.2d 427, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salvalo-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack