People v. Salois

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Salois

198 N.W.2d 690, 40 Mich. App. 481, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1173

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 5, 1972

DocketDocket No. 12637

StatusPublished

This text of 198 N.W.2d 690 (People v. Salois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Salois, 198 N.W.2d 690, 40 Mich. App. 481, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted of the crime of escape on his plea of guilty. He appeals contending that the sentence [482]*482of 1-1/2 to 5 years imposed along with the forfeiture of his accumulated good time by the State Corrections Department amounts to double jeopardy. Defendant’s contention is incorrect. See People v Wilson, 6 Mich App 474 (1967); People v Shastal, 26 Mich App 347 (1970); People v Alexander, 39 Mich App 607 (1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted of the crime of escape on his plea of guilty. He appeals contending that the sentence [482]*482of 1-1/2 to 5 years imposed along with the forfeiture of his accumulated good time by the State Corrections Department amounts to double jeopardy. Defendant’s contention is incorrect. See People v Wilson, 6 Mich App 474 (1967); People v Shastal, 26 Mich App 347 (1970); People v Alexander, 39 Mich App 607 (1972).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 N.W.2d 690, 40 Mich. App. 481, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salois-michctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack