People v. Salmon

281 A.D.2d 437, 721 N.Y.S.2d 262, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 5, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 437 (People v. Salmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Salmon, 281 A.D.2d 437, 721 N.Y.S.2d 262, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered November 6, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a [438]*438weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

At trial, the sole eyewitness to the murder of Esther Epps testified that he saw the defendant use the same gun to threaten another woman a few days earlier. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial. The trial court sustained the objection of the defendant’s attorney to the testimony and promptly issued a curative instruction alleviating any prejudice that may have resulted from the brief reference to a prior uncharged crime (see, People v Reed, 176 AD2d 972; People v Aguirre, 248 AD2d 717).

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Salmon
300 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Hogan
292 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D.2d 437, 721 N.Y.S.2d 262, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salmon-nyappdiv-2001.