People v. Salmon

114 A.D.2d 983, 495 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54030

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered March 15, 1982, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Gonzalez, 110 AD2d 909). Had defendant preserved this issue for review, the record demonstrates that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Mattocks, 100 AD2d 944). No facts have been presented in support of defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or excessive. We further note that the sentence imposed was that which was promised when the plea was accepted (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Salmon, 114 A.D.2d 983, 495 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54030 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

114 A.D.2d 983 (People v. Salmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Hoke
468 N.E.2d 677 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Mattocks
100 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Gonzalez
110 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)