People v. Sallai

215 A.D.2d 786, 627 N.Y.S.2d 975

This text of 215 A.D.2d 786 (People v. Sallai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sallai, 215 A.D.2d 786, 627 N.Y.S.2d 975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), imposed March 11, 1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition [787]*787thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of burglary in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s amended sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D.2d 786, 627 N.Y.S.2d 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sallai-nyappdiv-1995.