People v. Sall

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Sall

216 N.E.2d 841, 17 N.Y.2d 731, 269 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1414

DecidedApril 28, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 216 N.E.2d 841 (People v. Sall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sall, 216 N.E.2d 841, 17 N.Y.2d 731, 269 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1414 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In each action: Judgment reversed, motion to withdraw plea granted and information reinstated upon the ground that on the facts in this case it was an abuse of discretion to refuse to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea (see People v. Shipman, 14 N Y 2d 883). We do not pass on the questions of whether the informations are defective or insufficient or whether defend[733]*733anís should ho treated as youthful offenders. These matters are left for decision by the trial court.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges F old, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scilepfi, Bergan and Keating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In each action: Judgment reversed, motion to withdraw plea granted and information reinstated upon the ground that on the facts in this case it was an abuse of discretion to refuse to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea (see People v. Shipman, 14 N Y 2d 883). We do not pass on the questions of whether the informations are defective or insufficient or whether defend[733]*733anís should ho treated as youthful offenders. These matters are left for decision by the trial court.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges F old, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scilepfi, Bergan and Keating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 N.E.2d 841, 17 N.Y.2d 731, 269 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sall-ny-1966.