People v. Salisbury

225 N.E.2d 576, 19 N.Y.2d 703, 278 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1719
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 23, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 225 N.E.2d 576 (People v. Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Salisbury, 225 N.E.2d 576, 19 N.Y.2d 703, 278 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1719 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the provisions of subdivision (5) of section 913-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure are unconstitutionally vague within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeals, passing upon this question, held that there was no violation of appellant’s constitutional rights. [See 18 N Y 2d 899.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 N.E.2d 576, 19 N.Y.2d 703, 278 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salisbury-ny-1967.