People v. Salisbury
This text of 225 N.E.2d 576 (People v. Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the provisions of subdivision (5) of section 913-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure are unconstitutionally vague within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeals, passing upon this question, held that there was no violation of appellant’s constitutional rights. [See 18 N Y 2d 899.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 N.E.2d 576, 19 N.Y.2d 703, 278 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salisbury-ny-1967.