People v. Salem

169 A.D.2d 594, 564 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 609
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 29, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 A.D.2d 594 (People v. Salem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Salem, 169 A.D.2d 594, 564 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), rendered January 31, 1989, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 2Va to 7 years, to run concurrently with a sentence of 1 to 3 years imposed on defendant’s conviction in Queens County, unanimously affirmed.

The court was not obliged to sentence defendant, who had breached the plea agreement by absconding and committing further crimes, to the originally promised sentence of probation. (People v Asencio, 143 AD2d 917, lv denied 73 NY2d 889.) Nor, under the circumstances presented, and in view of defendant’s prior criminal history, do we find the imposition of the [595]*595maximum sentence to constitute an abuse of discretion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Maietta
173 A.D.2d 17 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A.D.2d 594, 564 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salem-nyappdiv-1991.