People v. Salaam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Salaam

56 A.D.2d 938, 392 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11345

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 938 (People v. Salaam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Salaam, 56 A.D.2d 938, 392 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed March 5, 1975, nunc pro tunc as of January 30, 1961 (see People v Montgomery, 24 NY2d 130), upon his conviction of [939]*939robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the resentence being a term of imprisonment with a minimum oil Vi years and a maximum of 30 years. Resentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to the time already served and defendant is discharged from parole. The resentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed March 5, 1975, nunc pro tunc as of January 30, 1961 (see People v Montgomery, 24 NY2d 130), upon his conviction of [939]*939robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the resentence being a term of imprisonment with a minimum oil Vi years and a maximum of 30 years. Resentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to the time already served and defendant is discharged from parole. The resentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 938, 392 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-salaam-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack