People v. Sakinovic
This text of 149 A.D.3d 1596 (People v. Sakinovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Herkimer County Court (John H. Crandall, J.), rendered December 16, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in determining that granting defendant youthful offender status would not serve the interest of justice. We reject that contention (see CPL 720.20 [1] [a]; People v Agee, 140 AD3d 1704, 1704-1705 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 925 [2016]), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender (see Agee, 140 AD3d at 1704-1705). Contrary to defendant’s further [1597]*1597contention, the agreed-upon sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 A.D.3d 1596, 51 N.Y.S.3d 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sakinovic-nyappdiv-2017.