People v. Sajous

183 Misc. 2d 332, 705 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 635
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 21, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.

[333]*333Although the prosecutor’s witness had a criminal background, this alone would not render his testimony incredible as a matter of law. Moreover, whatever misgivings might attend a conviction based solely on his testimony are laid to rest by the tape recordings which were introduced into evidence and amply corroborate that testimony.

We also find that any alleged delay in turning over Brady material did not prejudice the defendant in any manner whatsoever and that the affirmative defense of renunciation was not established (Penal Law §§ 40.10, 25.00 [2]; People v Ozarowski, 38 NY2d 481).

DiPaola, P. J., Ingrassia and Levitt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sajous, 183 Misc. 2d 332, 705 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

183 Misc. 2d 332 (People v. Sajous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Plate
2003 NY Slip Op 51503 (New York Town and Village Courts, 2003)