People v. Saigo

2016 NY Slip Op 6762, 143 A.D.3d 532, 38 N.Y.S.3d 802
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Saigo. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 A.D.3d 643
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 2016·No. 3794/12 1919 645/13 1918·Published

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J., at plea on indictment No. 3794/12; Juan M. Merchan, J., at plea on indictment No. 645/13 and sentence that covered both pleas), rendered December 6, 2013, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Saigo, 2016 NY Slip Op 6762, 143 A.D.3d 532, 38 N.Y.S.3d 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 6762 (People v. Saigo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)