People v. Saft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Saft

29 A.D.2d 618, 286 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 618 (People v. Saft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Saft, 29 A.D.2d 618, 286 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: The conspiracy counts of the indictments are sufficient. The allegations thereof, including those appearing under the headings “Overt Acts” sufficiently set forth the essential elements of the respective crimes charged. (Code Crim. Pro., § 285; People v. Willis, 158 N. Y. 392, 397; People v. Farson, 244 N. Y. 413; People v. Scobie, 257 App. Div. 854, affd. 281 N. Y. 796.) The order should, therefore, be modified by striking from the first ordering paragraph thereof the words “ First ” and by providing that the demurrers to the counts designated “ First ” be disallowed. (Appeal from order of Erie County Court allowing demurrers to various counts of two indictments.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: The conspiracy counts of the indictments are sufficient. The allegations thereof, including those appearing under the headings “Overt Acts” sufficiently set forth the essential elements of the respective crimes charged. (Code Crim. Pro., § 285; People v. Willis, 158 N. Y. 392, 397; People v. Farson, 244 N. Y. 413; People v. Scobie, 257 App. Div. 854, affd. 281 N. Y. 796.) The order should, therefore, be modified by striking from the first ordering paragraph thereof the words “ First ” and by providing that the demurrers to the counts designated “ First ” be disallowed. (Appeal from order of Erie County Court allowing demurrers to various counts of two indictments.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 618, 286 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-saft-nyappdiv-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack