People v. Safran

113 A.D.3d 880, 978 N.Y.2d 911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Safran. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 A.D.3d 878

Opinion

The record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Garcia, 92 NY2d 869 [1998]).

Additionally, the defendant’s claim that his sentence is “unlawful” is without merit. The defendant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, a class D felony. In accordance with his plea agreement, the defendant was sentenced to an agreed-upon term of imprisonment having a minimum of two years and a maximum of four years. Further, the sentence complied with Penal Law § 70.06 (3) and (4).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Safran, 113 A.D.3d 880, 978 N.Y.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

113 A.D.3d 880 (People v. Safran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Garcia
700 N.E.2d 311 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)