People v. Safasr

California Court of Appeal

People v. Safasr

58 Cal. App. 95

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 5, 1922

DocketCrim. No. 628

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cal. App. 95 (People v. Safasr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Safasr, 58 Cal. App. 95 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

FINCH, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant and his counsel failed to appear at the time set for oral argument. An examination of the record on appeal discloses no error.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FINCH, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant and his counsel failed to appear at the time set for oral argument. An examination of the record on appeal discloses no error.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cal. App. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-safasr-calctapp-1922.