People v. Sadler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sadler

131 A.D.2d 892, 517 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48326

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.2d 892 (People v. Sadler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sadler, 131 A.D.2d 892, 517 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered May 10, 1984, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). The defendant’s contentions with respect to errors committed in the jury charge are without merit (see, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, cert denied 459 US 847), and, under the circumstances, the sentence imposed was appropriate (see, People v [893]*893Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered May 10, 1984, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). The defendant’s contentions with respect to errors committed in the jury charge are without merit (see, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, cert denied 459 US 847), and, under the circumstances, the sentence imposed was appropriate (see, People v [893]*893Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 892, 517 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sadler-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack