People v. Sackel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sackel

130 A.D.2d 525, 515 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46522

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 525 (People v. Sackel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sackel, 130 A.D.2d 525, 515 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Battisti, J.), rendered July 22, 1983, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As a condition of his plea, the defendant withdrew all motions. He therefore waived his right to appellate review of the denial of any motions to suppress (see, People v Feingold, 125 AD2d 587).

The defendant’s contention that he should not have been sentenced as a second felony offender because his prior conviction was based on a plea which he claims was insufficient is without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Battisti, J.), rendered July 22, 1983, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As a condition of his plea, the defendant withdrew all motions. He therefore waived his right to appellate review of the denial of any motions to suppress (see, People v Feingold, 125 AD2d 587).

The defendant’s contention that he should not have been sentenced as a second felony offender because his prior conviction was based on a plea which he claims was insufficient is without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 525, 515 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sackel-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack