People v. Saccomanno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Saccomanno

83 A.D.2d 843, 441 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 3, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Saccomanno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Saccomanno, 83 A.D.2d 843, 441 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), rendered April 14, 1980 (Ind No. 78/956), convicting him of two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubin, J.), rendered April 14, 1980 and amended on December 30, 1980 (Ind Nos. 79/64, 79/913), convicting him of two counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. There was ample justification for the exclusion of defendant from the courtroom. Defendant’s request to proceed pro se was made on the eve of trial. It should be noted that defendant was not a novice in courtroom procedures. Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), rendered April 14, 1980 (Ind No. 78/956), convicting him of two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubin, J.), rendered April 14, 1980 and amended on December 30, 1980 (Ind Nos. 79/64, 79/913), convicting him of two counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. There was ample justification for the exclusion of defendant from the courtroom. Defendant’s request to proceed pro se was made on the eve of trial. It should be noted that defendant was not a novice in courtroom procedures. Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 843, 441 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-saccomanno-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack