People v. Sabino

104 A.D.3d 960, 961 N.Y.S.2d 783

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed July 2, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Elmer, 19 NY3d 501 [2012]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dillon, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sabino, 104 A.D.3d 960, 961 N.Y.S.2d 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

104 A.D.3d 960 (People v. Sabino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Elmer
973 N.E.2d 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)