People v. Sabatini
This text of 188 A.D.2d 568 (People v. Sabatini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Sweeny, J.), rendered January 8, 1991, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence was not excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.D.2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sabatini-nyappdiv-1992.