People v. Sabater

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sabater

2016 NY Slip Op 7683, 144 A.D.3d 950, 40 N.Y.S.3d 780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 2016

Docket2015-05660

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 7683 (People v. Sabater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sabater, 2016 NY Slip Op 7683, 144 A.D.3d 950, 40 N.Y.S.3d 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), rendered May 28, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*951 Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal, executed at his plea proceeding, precludes him from now challenging the County Court’s exclusion of him from its in camera examination of a confidential informant pursuant to its determination of the defendant’s pretrial suppression motion, as well as the County Court’s determination of his application for judicial diversion pursuant to CPL 216.00 (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]; People v Ceparano, 96 AD3d 774, 775 [2012]).

Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), rendered May 28, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*951 Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal, executed at his plea proceeding, precludes him from now challenging the County Court’s exclusion of him from its in camera examination of a confidential informant pursuant to its determination of the defendant’s pretrial suppression motion, as well as the County Court’s determination of his application for judicial diversion pursuant to CPL 216.00 (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]; People v Ceparano, 96 AD3d 774, 775 [2012]).

Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 NY Slip Op 7683, 144 A.D.3d 950, 40 N.Y.S.3d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sabater-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack