People v. Ryff

262 N.E.2d 222, 27 N.Y.2d 707, 314 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1183
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1970·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. Order modified by limiting the suppression of evidence to statements made by defendant after his arrest without the warning required by Miranda v. Arizona (384 U. S. 436) and, as modified, affirmed. The pedigree statements and acts of defendant made initially to the police for identification were admissible (People v. Rivera, 26 N Y 2d 304; Farley v. United States, 381 F. 2d 357, cert. den. 389 U. S. 942; Clarke v. State, 3 Md. App. 447). These include the name stated by him and the credit card exhibited.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson concur; Judge Burke taking no part.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ryff, 262 N.E.2d 222, 27 N.Y.2d 707, 314 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1183 (N.Y. 1970).

262 N.E.2d 222 (People v. Ryff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cowart
114 Misc. 2d 881 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
People v. Rodriguez
111 Misc. 2d 747 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
People v. Jones
84 Misc. 2d 737 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)