People v. Ryff
This text of 262 N.E.2d 222 (People v. Ryff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. Order modified by limiting the suppression of evidence to statements made by defendant after his arrest without the warning required by Miranda v. Arizona (384 U. S. 436) and, as modified, affirmed. The pedigree statements and acts of defendant made initially to the police for identification were admissible (People v. Rivera, 26 N Y 2d 304; Farley v. United States, 381 F. 2d 357, cert. den. 389 U. S. 942; Clarke v. State, 3 Md. App. 447). These include the name stated by him and the credit card exhibited.
Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson concur; Judge Burke taking no part.
Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 N.E.2d 222, 27 N.Y.2d 707, 314 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ryff-ny-1970.