People v. Ryder
This text of 239 A.D.2d 364 (People v. Ryder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), imposed February 28, 1996, the resentence being an indeterminate term of three to six years imprisonment, [365]*365upon his conviction of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The resentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at the trial is not properly before this Court. Alleged errors committed at the trial may not be raised on an appeal from a resentence, regardless of whether or not they were raised on the appeal from the original judgment (see, People v Tatta, 196 AD2d 328, 332; People v Cahill, 190 AD2d 744, 745; People v Ennis, 119 AD2d 689; People v Manino, 90 AD2d 777). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D.2d 364, 657 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ryder-nyappdiv-1997.