People v. Rutledge

155 A.D.3d 462, 63 N.Y.S.3d 673
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 14, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D.3d 462 (People v. Rutledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rutledge, 155 A.D.3d 462, 63 N.Y.S.3d 673 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Neil Ross, J.), rendered May 3, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.D.3d 462, 63 N.Y.S.3d 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rutledge-nysupct-2017.