People v. Rutledge

155 A.D.3d 462, 63 N.Y.S.3d 673
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 14, 2017·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Neil Ross, J.), rendered May 3, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rutledge, 155 A.D.3d 462, 63 N.Y.S.3d 673 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2017).

155 A.D.3d 462 (People v. Rutledge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.